Search results

this is where... majority of the new age consumers don't understand. because their mentality, had been kidnapped by the 4 corners of their displays, rather than understanding, what basic fundamentals of theatrical presentation should be.

if ur vision is "controlled" by the edge of the display, u'll feel the approximate 60% image in the center of the display is small because of the additional in-activity on the left and right sides of the image. however, should u put ur focus on the thickness the black bar top and bottom of the...

i agree with u on this... partially. non anamorphic WS2.35:1 image will look disturbingly small in window boxing. however, WS1.85:1, with bigger image, will have close/consistent height of black bars top and bottom as with anamorphic WS2.35:1 image, where the latter have the sides filled up. my...

i'm not confused. instead, i see and point out a common confusion from some folks, for example like John, who might have forgotten when and where we initially started and come into this 16x9 age, would burst a balloon of question, "why does the image looks odd on my display?" we should not feel...

i saw that. and i've quoted his picture as well. just in case u've not noticed.

alternatively... if one bothers to put focus on the consistency of black bar thickness from top and bottom, one would not realize that they're viewing what a typical TV broadcast content should be sized. for example... from my 75" 16:9 TV, i realize that when ever i played a WS1.85:1 content...

i'm pretty sure, John is confused on the basic fundamentals of "EVE-Expansive Viewing Experience" should be horizontally panoramic, not vertically... where it's a common issue that bugs consumers sense of thought. "Why the image doesn't fills up my screen? i paid alot of monies for those unused...

yes. that stands correct for those not "shot to spec" matching to 16x9 widescreen aspect ratio.

this is the way i replay WideScreen 1.66~1.95:1 on my Xtra Large sized 75" TV to get a black bar top and bottom same sized as WideScreen 2.2~2.4:1 movies on 16:9 screen.

the presentation seems to indicate the disc is a non-anamorphic 4:3 "letterbox" widescreen transfer. depending on initial setting on the playback device, considering that the display device setting is set to default 16:9, i say your playback device setting is correct @ detecting 4:3 widescreen...