Search results

Watched the anaglyph 3D version of "Last Man on Earth" last night. Pretty good 3D. Image is clear, audio clear. In the end, I'm not sure it's any more interesting than the flat version.

Yes, good point. I'm glad we got the "good" Oscar, and not the "Star Wars" Oscar.

I'm somewhat mystified by the positive reactions to "Moon Knight." It just seemed like a long drawn-out mess that, had it been well edited, might have made a good 125 minute film.

Larry Semon's father was Zera Semon, a somewhat well-known traveling magician.

Great movie.

I remember seeing this at the Arclight in Maryland when it was brought back at some point. Advertised as the original theatrical cut, we instead were treated to the director's cut. No thanks. Almost everyone in the theater was online at the box office for a refund after the show.

No Sigourney Weaver, no purchase.

Fletch was amusing when new. Chevy Chase was funny. How the world has changed.

There's a guy on YouTube who specializes in somehow wiping the vocals from the tracks of the TV specials, which makes for some really interesting (if a bit bumpy) listening.

God, the screaming in the theater when this was first released when William Devane's hand met its fate.

It's amazing how elastic Shelley's original premise remains.

Works for this happy Patreon supporter of the site.

I broke out the new 4k disc of "Dr. Terror's House of Horrors" and discovered that it would not play in my Sony unit. Put it in my LG player and it worked with no problem. Anyone else have this issue?

Typical bad screenwriting: one nut on both sides. Good people die. Zzzzzzz.

It HAS to be better than Alien: Covenant, which I felt was just a giant kick in the balls from Scott to fans of the series.

A lot of praise for this film among horror fans, of which I am one, but it was one and done for me. Every zombie film that cops the end of "Night of the Living Dead" gets a demerit.

Only RAH could manage to sneak Lee Marvin into a review of this middling film.

Orson Welles on Elia Kazan: “He is a man who sold to McCarthy all his companions at a time when he could continue to work in New York at high salary. And having sold all of his people to McCarthy, he then made a film called On the Waterfront which was a celebration of the informer. And...

My copy came from amazon today. I remember enjoying the film despite the preposterous moment when it really jumped the shark (for me) when Did I miss something? How is something like that even remotely possible? Seems like typical Cameron's typical weak screenwriting to me. Other opinions...

Hit my mailbox today. Spinning the disc tonight. Saw this film on the first day it played Radio City Music Hall. Beautiful to watch.

Mr. Harris, the apostrophe police are on your trail! :) "own's" is neither a contraction nor a possessive.

I remember reading the novel before seeing the film, and admiring the former while yawning during the latter.

I well remember watching the laser disc of Aliens in horror. You could barely see the actors for the grain. Looking forward to this.

It's fun to play "spot Brando's double" on this film. Any time you don't see Brando's face, it's not him.

Excellent chemistry between both stars on a hot streak in the trailer

Terrific movie for so many reasons.

First: Mark Wahlberg? Big dumb hole at the center of the film. Two: I'll take "Big Fish" any day.

Did Robinson ever give a bad performance? I can't name one.

The most recent trailer was certainly more promising than the earlier ones. I'll bite.

When your star is not hiding her negative feelings about her film before it comes out, you are in trouble (Sony).