“Du point de vue éthique, l'approche ici décrite suscite des réserves. Il est de notre avis que les pratiques utilisées ici, sur la base de vieillissants scans, devraient être plus clairement rejetées par la presse spécialisée et autres influenceurs, afin d'éviter que d'autres œuvres...
No matter how many times we think about the matter, what Cameron has done with his films is a shame. They are all a shame. Terminator 2, The Abyss, True Lines, Alines and of course Titanic, are all an absolute disgrace. A barbarity.
And can you imagine that art critics gave this flagrant adulteration of The Mona Lisa a score of 10/10 in an analysis? That's what's happening with Titanic, because they like the new aesthetic appearance they give it 10/10, and who knows if being such an important American title they are helping...
It's already a travesty. There are close-ups that are already a travesty with how ridiculously emphasized his facial features are.
If that's not a travesty, what is a travesty? It would be necessary to rethink the term and redefine the meaning of the word travesty
So, are we facing an...
When the analyzes rate a transfer with maximum marks of 10/10, but in the most specialized forums around the world criticisms cascade, all pointing to the same types of problems, the problem undoubtedly exists and that has been deliberately omitted by the reviewers.
We people in the specialized...
If my comment seemed condescending to you, it wasn't at all, not at all.
I just wanted to point out that the average user sometimes confuses higher image quality with what would be the correct way to view content, and Titanic 4K/UHD now looks more like 8K video than a celluloid UHD transfer...
Your message is perfect. I can only applaud him.
It perfectly describes what I think and have felt when watching Titanic 4K/UHD, which has very worrying levels of unnaturalness and artificiality. It is really discouraging that the reviews have given this work maximum marks.
Thank you.
I think we're getting to the point where people confuse looking better with looking correct
We should not wish for Titanic to look better, but correctly.
When we precisely calibrate our screens, we do not do it so that they look better, but correctly, and in this context we are beginning to...
What definitely ruins the UHD experience are the close-ups, which have been overly emphasized by the AI, in some cases, to ridiculous levels.
I wonder if by a fully automated process? since during the supervision of a job correctly carried out shot by shot, such a inconsistent final result...
The problem with Titanic UHD is that the AI algorithm, when analyzing the facial features of some actors in more or less static close-ups, exaggeratedly emphasizes it, offering levels of detail in those definitely ridiculous facial features that strongly attacks the photography original of the...
The day I saw it in theaters I was horrified by the impact that this great horror classic had on me.
Today I was horrified with the color grading approved for this great movie
I have never understood those who claim to remember what the movie looked like in theaters, but what the hell, today...
It is simply marketing to give the product a greater commercial projection.
Remember the meaning of the words in their proper context.
The movie was already made. To restore it is to return it to its original appearance. If you don't do this, it's not a restoration, it's just a revisionist...
Marketing is an important factor in this whole issue.
To say that the work is done to preserve the original material and that Coppola approved it because it is what he believes the film to be in theaters, is only marketing.
But one thing is what is said from the outside as part of marketing...
I was able to review this movie in UHD format and I think the differences from bluray are subtle but welcome.
The bluray is already very good and this UHD comes to improve with subtle improvements in detail, color and dynamic range.
The improvement in details is minimal, in color too except...
Hello from Spain Valencian community.
I am a fan of cinema and Home Cinema, and I am here to expand my knowledge.
I take advantage of this open presentation thread to cordially greet all of you.
But the photography of many films has an important artistic component, which in the case of this film is craft.
If you change the artistic component of something as transcendental as the photography of the film, it is lost, and the message you send to new audiences is not educational, it is the...
In my case I have the Bluray 2008 and the UHD 2022, I have to say that I am extremely disappointed with the transfer to UHD.
There is no doubt that in my case I would have preferred some UHD discs faithful to the original concept of Willis, who is the true architect of the original photography...