Search results

Yes, it could be the case that one line- out of all the dialogue in all of his movies- drove him so crazy that he finally had to change it after 26 years. To me, much more likely is that someone screwed up. Again, I think both scenarios are nuts.

Yeah, that's the norm for Mann but it would be the only time that Cameron went back decades after the fact to cut an essentially meaningless line that no one would notice anyway. IF that's the case (and I doubt it is), I'd be curious as to what made him feel the need to change those lines of...

Both seem crazy to me. How do they accidentally cut out a line and why would Cameron think after 25 years, "Eh, I think he should only say that one time"? If I was a betting man, I'd say it was somehow an accident.

Weird that it's missing but since it's that scene, I can see how it was relatively unnoticed. Multiple people are yelling, there's ADR for the extras, there's the sound effects of the bench getting torn up and then smashed into the gate and the music is going too. I must have seen Titanic over...

If it's when they're being shot at by Cal as they run into the flooding dining room, it may just be buried in the Atmos remix?

This is not meant to be offensive but do you have every movie ever made memorized? You always seem to spot some completely inconsequential line missing from a movie or TV show. It's an amazing ability.

I'm part of the audience so what's the difference?

Nope. I have my memories and my enjoyment of a movie but it'll never be "my" movie and the idea that it is just a ridiculous level of entitlement.

Yeah, it's always been in the movie. It's one of the first (maybe the first?) face replacement shots. Winslet's stunt double has a different shaped face/head so the replacement is more obvious than Leo's which works better because they have a similar shaped head and because he's behind her so...