Search results

Unfortunately, there are also serious differences in the movie projection from cinema to cinema. Not so serious I think for a short time on passing tears and dirt particles in an older movie which may irritate in today's digital world a bit, but in my opinion, far from destroying the work. In...

Then you have seen a version before the Nolan version. The lost of details in shadows and (!) in the lights are inherent the new 65mm negative. It is impossible to compensate these both issues with color correction or processing correction. You need once more to go back to the original negative.

This is not possible, because all prints were made from the same 65mm Intermed negative, processing in the same lab. And other descriptions as in Europe and in USA sound similar. Please compare the mentioned issues directly with the ten years old Blu-ray.

First run prints from Metrocolor lab in 1968 in 70mm were nearly perfect. No UHD could surpass this quality. The Christopher Nolan restoration (yes, it is restored) occures (as his Dunkirk + Interstellar prints) very poor: nearly no details in shadows and lights, desaturated colors, last reel...