- Joined
- Jul 3, 1997
- Messages
- 66,751
- Real Name
- Ronald Epstein
I wouldn't say that as I viewed it on my OLED. Perhaps it looks that way on a projector.If you want WEST SIDE STORY for $5 it's a no-brainer.
However, it's not a good transfer.
I didn't realize it at first. I am watching it and it seems like it's a notch above the Blu-ray. However, as I get farther into the film I find myself disappointed by the lack of detail. The transfer looks soft/blurred.
Then I find out that MGM didn't even do a new transfer. This is basically the old transfer just upconverted to 4k.
I mean, DR. NO and the other James Bond films on 4k looked much, much better than this.
I wouldn't say that as I viewed it on my OLED. Perhaps it looks that way on a projector. .
I guess we just disagree then. I agree it's derived from an old transfer, but I did enough comparisons between the DVD, Blu-ray and this digital to be relatively happy with the $4.99 I spent back in 2018, that upgraded to 4K this past November.No, it's true. Something seemed off. I thought it was just me but it was confirmed.
I guess we just disagree then. I agree it's derived from an old transfer, but I did enough comparisons between the DVD, Blu-ray and this digital to be relatively happy with the $4.99 I spent back in 2018, that upgraded to 4K this past November.
Did you watch it on your projector?Thanks, Josh!
I can only compare it to the best stuff I have seen thus far and that is the James Bond films from the same era.
West Side Story comes nowhere close
Did you watch it on your projector?
Right!Not all 4K scans are created equal, unfortunately. The Bond films were scanned from the original camera negatives and underwent extensive cleanup. West Side Story wasn’t off the negative and didn’t get the same level of care.