Well both those options cost a lot more. The Eero 6 has a package with an extender, implying it needs an extender. And since I’ve got a TiVo Edge, I needed a Moca adaptor. I wonder how that would fit in with the Eero and Nest?Johnny,
My recommendation is to actually skip the extender and go straight for a better solution overall with wireless mesh. You can disable the wifi in your modem, and just add an external wireless system like Eero or Google Nest WiFi. You'll have a way better experience.
One final warning: Don’t even consider extenders that don’t use 802.11ac. Old, 802.11n extenders are even cheaper, but when such extenders are running, they significantly decrease the speed of all devices on your Wi-Fi; in addition, for devices connected by Wi-Fi to the extender, such models provide less than half of the base router’s speed.
This is a topic where I'd just buy what the Wirecutter recommends, particularly if you can't jump up to a new mesh system. And note their caveat on older devices, because a simple extender can have a 50% speed hit and even slow down your entire network.
The Best Wi-Fi Extender and Signal Booster
If you have rooms where 4K streams don’t work or browsing is too slow, you might solve the problem with a Wi-Fi extender—without replacing your whole network.www.nytimes.com
Yes there is.Is there a large mirror in your master suite? The metal layer in the mirror messes up Wi-Fi signals.
Single story house. The weak area is over a 100’ away with a couple of walls. In the way. I can’t move the router because that’s were the broadband enters the house. I determine the signal is week by using my iphone 11. Usually one little dot of wifi and sometimes I have to switch to the lower band.I'd like to know more about your environment so that we can determine why the signal is weak before recommending a solution. For starters...
- How far is the wifi router from the area with the weak signal? Same physical floor?
- How are you determining the signal is weak? As @DaveF alluded, it could be an issue with interference.
Thanks for the additional info. I would bet the mirror is in fact impeding the signal, although 100 ft is a long distance for a consumer level product to effectively cover. I think your best bet would be to run an Ethernet cable from the router to the remote location. I don't know the exact layout you're working with but, in a single story home, this should be doable.Yes there is.
Single story house. The weak area is over a 100’ away with a couple of walls. In the way. I can’t move the router because that’s were the broadband enters the house. I determine the signal is week by using my iphone 11. Usually one little dot of wifi and sometimes I have to switch to the lower band.
I’m basically happy with my wifi strength in the rest of the house. I can get better reception back there just by choosing the slower channel. I had made an assumption (usually not a good idea) that an extender would do just that but without slowing up my existing wifi.If, for whatever reason, this is not practical then your next best option is likely a mesh solution with a node placed equidistant between both points.
I should have caught this before. If you mean choosing the 2.4Ghz band as opposed to 5Ghz then that makes sense as 5Ghz signals cannot travel nearly as far as 2.4Ghz. Still, 2.4 Ghz is capable of [theoretical] speeds up to 600 Mbps. While real-world speeds will be slower, it is generally suitable for most applications including HD streaming. Are you experiencing any performance degradation using 2.4Ghz or do you just prefer to use 5Ghz?I’m basically happy with my wifi strength in the rest of the house. I can get better reception back there just by choosing the slower channel
I’m basically happy with my wifi strength in the rest of the house. I can get better reception back there just by choosing the slower channel. I had made an assumption (usually not a good idea) that an extender would do just that but without slowing up my existing wifi.
Would this mesh system work? Would it work with a modem/router that already has a Moca adaptor attached to it. My TiVo needs the Moca.
All we use in the bedroom is our phones. I was irritated by the loss of signal and I thought just get an extender. Now that it’s not so simple or cheap, I’m rethinking this.I should have caught this before. If you mean choosing the 2.4Ghz band as opposed to 5Ghz then that makes sense as 5Ghz signals cannot travel nearly as far as 2.4Ghz. Still, 2.4 Ghz is capable of [theoretical] speeds up to 600 Mbps. While real-world speeds will be slower, it is generally suitable for most applications including HD streaming. Are you experiencing any performance degradation using 2.4Ghz or do you just prefer to use 5Ghz?
Yea, unless you're actually experiencing performance degradation I would just use the 2.4 Ghz band in the bedroom and save your money. There's nothing wrong with 2.4Ghz and it has a much longer range than 5Ghz.All we use in the bedroom is our phones. I was irritated by the loss of signal and I thought just get an extender. Now that it’s not so simple or cheap, I’m rethinking this.
Not to get too into the weeds here, but I'll do it since we're both network guys .This sounds a little like it could be a classic case of receive/send power mismatch. Lots of mobile devices will download/receive acceptably at a poor signal strength, but the upload/send antenna is power limited in software, causing significant packet loss on any packets sent from the device back to the AP. This is usually unidirectional and hard to track down.Yea, unless you're actually experiencing performance degradation I would just use the 2.4 Ghz band in the bedroom and save your money. There's nothing wrong with 2.4Ghz and it has a much longer range than 5Ghz.
When a T-Rex comes walking down the street I will climb up into the attic.If Johnny was willing to spend an hour or two in the attic running a network cable to the far end of the house
Not to get too into the weeds here, but I'll do it since we're both network guys .This sounds a little like it could be a classic case of receive/send power mismatch. Lots of mobile devices will download/receive acceptably at a poor signal strength, but the upload/send antenna is power limited in software, causing significant packet loss on any packets sent from the device back to the AP. This is usually unidirectional and hard to track down.
For the above reason, that's why I'm steering @Johnny Angell towards a mesh solution. Not because I want him to spend unnecessary money, but because I think it will end up with a more consistent result.
If Johnny was willing to spend an hour or two in the attic running a network cable to the far end of the house, a cheap access point like this would be the optimal solution:
Failing that, the modern mesh solutions like Eero are pretty trouble free and "just work", which is what most people really want.