jason_hussey
Auditioning
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2007
- Messages
- 9
- Real Name
- jason
Ok, so that's a little misleading. I understand the premise of the A/V receiver and completely graps the necessity for surround sound.
My real question is that if an A/V receiver has to process video signals, isn't that just one more link along the chain that could degrade your source?
For example, if I'm using an HD source (PS3, Cable, etc) and it goes to the receiver...does the receiver have to alter that signal at all to send it to my TV? I think I read that if its 1080p, it'll pass through unmolested, but what if say I have a 720p signal coming from the football game on TV...and my receiver tries to upconvert to 1080p...am I running a chance of ending up with a worse picture than had I just sent it straight to the television?
The root of the question is not knowing how a receiver's 'video capability' affects the overall image and why its not harmful to go to a receiver vice going straight to the TV with the video signal.
Thoughts?
My real question is that if an A/V receiver has to process video signals, isn't that just one more link along the chain that could degrade your source?
For example, if I'm using an HD source (PS3, Cable, etc) and it goes to the receiver...does the receiver have to alter that signal at all to send it to my TV? I think I read that if its 1080p, it'll pass through unmolested, but what if say I have a 720p signal coming from the football game on TV...and my receiver tries to upconvert to 1080p...am I running a chance of ending up with a worse picture than had I just sent it straight to the television?
The root of the question is not knowing how a receiver's 'video capability' affects the overall image and why its not harmful to go to a receiver vice going straight to the TV with the video signal.
Thoughts?