Thank you for your positive contribution to this thread.Tell it to Disney
Thank you for your positive contribution to this thread.Tell it to Disney
The video game market is pretty grim for physical collectors with 94% of games purchased digitally (2022).The Ubisoft account debacle shows what the real future of 'owning" digital" copies means, no matter how high the quality becomes.
The video game market is pretty grim for physical collectors with 94% of games purchased digitally (2022).
Considering the video game industry is more profitable than movies, and music combined, it is no wonder big movie studios are taking note.
Disney doing things like this is just strange to me. I'm not sure who this is being marketed to?
Physical, but not phyiscal. Like a magic trick.
WandaVision To Get Sleek Steelbook Release, But With One Strange Caveat
WandaVision fans looking forward to a physical release for the hit Disney Plus MCU series may want to pump the brakes on this one.gamerant.com
True, but loosing $651 million in two months is nothing to sneeze at either.24 million sets of eyes watching their movie, sports, and tv shows still isn't anything to sneeze at.
I think this is our only hope. We know it can be done (kaleidescape, and that lossless video streaming thing Sony was pushing for a while) but until a company like Apple decides it is worth it as a differentiator, the pricing/access are going to be a problem. It's not a perfect solution because of the way rights change over time, but then disks aren't perfect either, with more and more failing (so called disk rot) each year.The only reasonable path forward is to push for higher quality AV encodes available as digital, ala Uncompressed Atmos Music. The end of shiny plastic disks is happening faster than folks would like, but that doesn't mean it's slower than predicted.
2000 print run preorder for an upcoming fancy Collector's Edition of The Exorcist exclusive to the UK that sold out in just a matter of hours
Exactly. Three to twelve thousand units sold for a boutique label is a (big) win. To Disney, a disappointment.Add a couple zeros to that figure and it might be of interest to these mega corps?
Absolutely different markets, but I think it all boils down to the biggest common factor: convenience. That is streaming/digital.I think the markets are different. Most gamers consider video games disposable things in a constant cycle of being upgraded or replaced. For one thing, online play is a critical component of most games today, and that requires regular updates that can only be delivered digitally. A physical disc copy is just a hindrance to that.
When a new update or sequel comes out, the old version gets left behind. "Retro" gamers who continue to go back and play the old games are a very small niche in the market.
Absolutely different markets, but I think it all boils down to the biggest common factor: convenience. That is streaming/digital.
When the casual consumer (not us) watches a film, or series at home they aren't thinking about the ability to view it 20 years down the line. Ease of use, convenience.
Digital is the future, no matter how hard some fight it.
How many of us here rewatch films from our extensive disc catalogues? It is great to have them, and nice if we ever feel the need to revisit a certain film. However, I hardly ever revisit 90% + of the titles I own.I think we also basically had a widespread experiment with average, everyday non-enthusiast consumers purchasing movies on disc back when buying on DVD was new and more convenient than renting for a lot of people, and I think the result that experiment yielded is that most people didn’t really rewatch their discs or want a collection of them. For most a people, a disc collection didn’t become a new hobby or new way of life - it was another fad like tomagatchis or Funko Pops or Beanie Babies that seemed really fun for a hot second and then faded away. Once most people were able to get a movie by simply pressing a button on their remote, that was game over for their physical media days. It’s amazing but not surprising how quickly the transition happened.
Can someone explain what the point of the deal was between Mill Creek and Disney since Mill Creek hasn't released or announced anything new on bluray in quite a long time?
It's been explained several times in the Mill Creek/Disney thread. As Josh reiterated, again, the deal was never about any "new" titles, only keeping a certain slate of previously issued catalog titles in-print.Can someone explain what the point of the deal was between Mill Creek and Disney since Mill Creek hasn't released or announced anything new on bluray in quite a long time?
I rewatch ~20% of the titles I own fairly regularly. The majority were purchased because it was just as inexpensive to own a copy as it was to rent a copy (TV series *or* movies) with the purchase often being less than a rental fee (especially with TV series). If I never watch any of those titles again it's a wash. If I *do* it's a win.How many of us here rewatch films from our extensive disc catalogues? It is great to have them, and nice if we ever feel the need to revisit a certain film. However, I hardly ever revisit 90% + of the titles I own.
Watching them after I first purchase, and onto a nice "spine display" on my shelves for years, and years. Many never to be revisited at all. I suspect many people here with large catalogues do the same.
If Bill Hunt’s report at Digital Bits is accurate, a company in on small international territory that has rights to make steelbook cases for titles in their region did this on their own, and Disney apparently wasn’t even aware it existed until it was done.