What's new

International Disney Exiting Physical Media in Australia (1 Viewer)

Bryan^H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
9,613
The Ubisoft account debacle shows what the real future of 'owning" digital" copies means, no matter how high the quality becomes.
The video game market is pretty grim for physical collectors with 94% of games purchased digitally (2022).
Considering the video game industry is more profitable than movies, and music combined, it is no wonder big movie studios are taking note.

People will vote with their wallets.
 

willyTass

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
998
No bid deal . Technicolor Sydney no longer presses discs and for over a year , all domestic blu ray releases and 4K releases in Australia were being pressed in Mexico. I got my Cinderella 4K from Amazon Japan which smokes the garbage quality of Mexican replicators any day
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,343
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
The video game market is pretty grim for physical collectors with 94% of games purchased digitally (2022).
Considering the video game industry is more profitable than movies, and music combined, it is no wonder big movie studios are taking note.

I think the markets are different. Most gamers consider video games disposable things in a constant cycle of being upgraded or replaced. For one thing, online play is a critical component of most games today, and that requires regular updates that can only be delivered digitally. A physical disc copy is just a hindrance to that.

When a new update or sequel comes out, the old version gets left behind. "Retro" gamers who continue to go back and play the old games are a very small niche in the market.
 

BobNewport

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 19, 2023
Messages
70
Real Name
Bob Newport
24 million sets of eyes watching their movie, sports, and tv shows still isn't anything to sneeze at.
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,522
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Disney doing things like this is just strange to me. I'm not sure who this is being marketed to?
Physical, but not phyiscal. Like a magic trick.


If Bill Hunt’s report at Digital Bits is accurate, a company in on small international territory that has rights to make steelbook cases for titles in their region did this on their own, and Disney apparently wasn’t even aware it existed until it was done.
 

Nathan_H

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 26, 2001
Messages
316
The only reasonable path forward is to push for higher quality AV encodes available as digital, ala Uncompressed Atmos Music. The end of shiny plastic disks is happening faster than folks would like, but that doesn't mean it's slower than predicted.
I think this is our only hope. We know it can be done (kaleidescape, and that lossless video streaming thing Sony was pushing for a while) but until a company like Apple decides it is worth it as a differentiator, the pricing/access are going to be a problem. It's not a perfect solution because of the way rights change over time, but then disks aren't perfect either, with more and more failing (so called disk rot) each year.
 

Bryan^H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
9,613
I think the markets are different. Most gamers consider video games disposable things in a constant cycle of being upgraded or replaced. For one thing, online play is a critical component of most games today, and that requires regular updates that can only be delivered digitally. A physical disc copy is just a hindrance to that.

When a new update or sequel comes out, the old version gets left behind. "Retro" gamers who continue to go back and play the old games are a very small niche in the market.
Absolutely different markets, but I think it all boils down to the biggest common factor: convenience. That is streaming/digital.
When the casual consumer (not us) watches a film, or series at home they aren't thinking about the ability to view it 20 years down the line. Ease of use, convenience.
Digital is the future, no matter how hard some fight it.
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,522
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Absolutely different markets, but I think it all boils down to the biggest common factor: convenience. That is streaming/digital.
When the casual consumer (not us) watches a film, or series at home they aren't thinking about the ability to view it 20 years down the line. Ease of use, convenience.
Digital is the future, no matter how hard some fight it.

I think we also basically had a widespread experiment with average, everyday non-enthusiast consumers purchasing movies on disc back when buying on DVD was new and more convenient than renting for a lot of people, and I think the result that experiment yielded is that most people didn’t really rewatch their discs or want a collection of them. For most a people, a disc collection didn’t become a new hobby or new way of life - it was another fad like tomagatchis or Funko Pops or Beanie Babies that seemed really fun for a hot second and then faded away. Once most people were able to get a movie by simply pressing a button on their remote, that was game over for their physical media days. It’s amazing but not surprising how quickly the transition happened.
 

Bryan^H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
9,613
I think we also basically had a widespread experiment with average, everyday non-enthusiast consumers purchasing movies on disc back when buying on DVD was new and more convenient than renting for a lot of people, and I think the result that experiment yielded is that most people didn’t really rewatch their discs or want a collection of them. For most a people, a disc collection didn’t become a new hobby or new way of life - it was another fad like tomagatchis or Funko Pops or Beanie Babies that seemed really fun for a hot second and then faded away. Once most people were able to get a movie by simply pressing a button on their remote, that was game over for their physical media days. It’s amazing but not surprising how quickly the transition happened.
How many of us here rewatch films from our extensive disc catalogues? It is great to have them, and nice if we ever feel the need to revisit a certain film. However, I hardly ever revisit 90% + of the titles I own.


Watching them after I first purchase, and onto a nice "spine display" on my shelves for years, and years. Many never to be revisited at all. I suspect many people here with large catalogues do the same.
 

Robert13

Supporting Actor
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
805
Real Name
Robert
Can someone explain what the point of the deal was between Mill Creek and Disney since Mill Creek hasn't released or announced anything new on bluray in quite a long time?
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,522
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Can someone explain what the point of the deal was between Mill Creek and Disney since Mill Creek hasn't released or announced anything new on bluray in quite a long time?

Disney has a package of films, mostly from subsidiaries that no longer operate, that for whatever reason they wish to keep in print. Mill Creek previously licensed that package for several years. When their license expired, Disney then licensed that same package to Kino. When Kino’s license ended, Kino either did not wish to renew or wasn’t given the option to. Disney then relicensed them to Mill Creek. Simple as that. That deal was never about bringing new, previously unreleased titles to disc or providing format upgrades; it was solely about keeping some low-demand, discount bin titles in print.
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,359
Real Name
Malcolm
Can someone explain what the point of the deal was between Mill Creek and Disney since Mill Creek hasn't released or announced anything new on bluray in quite a long time?
It's been explained several times in the Mill Creek/Disney thread. As Josh reiterated, again, the deal was never about any "new" titles, only keeping a certain slate of previously issued catalog titles in-print.
 

BobO'Link

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
11,565
Location
Mid-South
Real Name
Howie
How many of us here rewatch films from our extensive disc catalogues? It is great to have them, and nice if we ever feel the need to revisit a certain film. However, I hardly ever revisit 90% + of the titles I own.


Watching them after I first purchase, and onto a nice "spine display" on my shelves for years, and years. Many never to be revisited at all. I suspect many people here with large catalogues do the same.
I rewatch ~20% of the titles I own fairly regularly. The majority were purchased because it was just as inexpensive to own a copy as it was to rent a copy (TV series *or* movies) with the purchase often being less than a rental fee (especially with TV series). If I never watch any of those titles again it's a wash. If I *do* it's a win.

I feel for the Australian Disney lovers. From what I read it's stupidly expensive to import titles there.
 

jayembee

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
6,929
Location
Hamster Shire
Real Name
Jerry
If Bill Hunt’s report at Digital Bits is accurate, a company in on small international territory that has rights to make steelbook cases for titles in their region did this on their own, and Disney apparently wasn’t even aware it existed until it was done.

That doesn't seem to make sense, unless the contract was incredibly vague on what rights the company was given. The SteelBook case, OK, I can see that, but one would think that the "character cards" included would have to be specifically licensed from Disney.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,445
Messages
5,138,374
Members
144,379
Latest member
Tok
Recent bookmarks
0
Top