That’s very cool that you got that experience. It was tough trying to get a good exposure. I’m a newbie to this, but I find it very enjoyable.Welcome to the forum, Dave. In the past, I shot some ice hockey at our local rink -- it used to be home to the Plymouth Whalers of the Ontario Hockey League, and is now home to USA Hockey's National Team Development Program (NTDP). It can be difficult to get the proper exposure, especially in the challenging (and usually poor) lighting conditions of smaller rinks. It looks like you did well with the photo above.
Fortunately, digital has a lot of dynamic range, so you have latitude as long as you shoot RAW. With ice hockey, there tends to be a lot of white, so it might help to set a but of + in the exposure compensation.That’s very cool that you got that experience. It was tough trying to get a good exposure. I’m a newbie to this, but I find it very enjoyable.
Agreed. I would set an exposure compensation of about +1 or + 1 1/3, which would tend to blow out the ice. I would then reduce the highlights of the RAW file in post to bring back some definition to the ice. Also, I would shoot in manual mode, and would also take a shot of a white spot on our boards for reference later -- I found our boards worked well as a white balance reference. The trick was finding enough white space between all the advertisements. It also helped if I used a constant max aperture lens if I was using a telezoom. Our rink had enough lighting that I could get away with a 70-200mm f/4.Fortunately, digital has a lot of dynamic range, so you have latitude as long as you shoot RAW. With ice hockey, there tends to be a lot of white, so it might help to set a but of + in the exposure compensation.