Actually, I have a lens from 7artisans that’s quite good as well. It’s the rear filter thread that swayed me.
Are both their lenses built similarly well?
I'm wondering why this Brightin Star seems slightly smaller and lighter...
_Man_
Actually, I have a lens from 7artisans that’s quite good as well. It’s the rear filter thread that swayed me.
They are all very heavy, solid, fully metal construction, with no communication with the camera. Fully manual, preset aperture, etc.
It arrived on Sunday. I've put it on the cameras and played around a little, but no actual photos yet. As promised, the barrel distortion is negligible. I understand it has some slight wavy distortion. It does have noticeable, but not excessive spherical distortion. I expect that can be corrected in PS, if someone bothers to create a profile for it. It's crazy wide. Definitely something you have to consciously compose for, or you simply end up with a really wide photo.^Hmmm... maybe time for me to buy/try PD's Camera Capture then... now that I've switched to using their 30L (photo) backpack most of the time (and already have 3x dual plates that all can be used w/ it)...
Did you receive yours yet? I'm probably just about ready to pull the trigger and give it a shot (as soon as I commit to reactivating my Prime service w/out trial offer this time) -- too bad B&H doesn't carry that brand... as they do actually carry a couple of the other ones...
I'm probably also gonna finally order a USB-C/USB3.2 CFexpress+XQD+UHS2-SD card reader (that's on some Prime Exclusive modest discount).
Also debating about getting either 512GB or 1TB ProGrade CFexpress card from B&H -- probably just going for 512GB at this point....
_Man_
The Nikkor Z 14-30mm S is pretty awesome. Much more versatile... and realistic of a lens to have.^No doubt it's crazy wide -- I probably really only need something like (slightly looser than) DX crop of 9mm myself... but then, that'd only leave me w/ like ~10MP from my Z6, heh.
_Man_
The Nikkor Z 14-30mm S is pretty awesome. Much more versatile... and realistic of a lens to have.
Is there such a thing as a full frame 12-24?Don't tempt me, LOL!
And that's apparently $200-off right now -- and available from B&H of course (so I can use my new Payboo card ).
Kinda wish it's actually more like 12-24mm though...
_Man_
Is there such a thing as a full frame 12-24?
Canon made an EF 11-24mm f/4 L for full frame dSLRs, and now have a RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS for their mirrorless full frame bodies. Sigma makes a 12-24mm f/4 ART lens for several full frame mounts.Is there such a thing as a full frame 12-24?
Peak Design was having a Black Friday sale, so I treated myself to an early Christmas gift. I bought their travel tripod. The carbon fiber version was $419, marked down from $599. I wanted something a little more compact for when we travel to Hawaii early next year. I probably would have left my Feisol travel tripod at home, as it's a little too bulky with the separate ball head. If I really like the Peak Design, I may just leave the Feisol at our place in South Carolina instead of hauling it back and forth from Michigan.
I went ahead and ordered the universal head adapter while it was on sale, just in case I need it in the future. I already have a very nice PhotoClam ballhead if I need to supplement the built-in head for special purposes.Do you shoot any panos?
IF so, you might wanna consider going for the universal head adapter plus some other small ball head w/ panning capability (while everything's on sale now).
I'm considering going for either this SmallRig one or one of these somewhat heftier (and probably more solid) K&F Concept ones that include spirit level instead -- the SmallRig probably adds practically unnoticeable weight while the others would add maybe upto ~1/2lb and still keep the tripod a slight bit lighter overall than the aluminum version.
The lack of panning capability can be pretty annoying me thinks... plus the stock ball head doesn't actually rest perfectly 90-degree/vertical when fully tilted, but goes a tad beyond, which is also a tad annoying...
Might also wanna finally get an L-bracket, which I kept putting off... especially if going w/ the SmallRig or just a very low profile, panning base head w/ QR.
_Man_
I went ahead and ordered the universal head adapter while it was on sale, just in case I need it in the future. I already have a very nice PhotoClam ballhead if I need to supplement the built-in head for special purposes.
The tripod arrived today. This thing is really compact -- noticeably so compared to my Feisol, which is also designated as a travel tripod. The head looks like it should do the job for most of my needs while traveling. The tripod is small enough that I hopefully will bring it on more trips in the future where I would have left the Feisol at home.
That K&F Concept ballhead looked interesting -- enough so that I added it to my Amazon wish list to keep track of just in case I want something compact in the future. My PhotoClam ballhead is very nice, but is bigger. I mostly will use the tripod for landscape shots such as long exposures of moving water (waves or waterfalls) or sunrise/sunset, and the built-in head on the Peak Design should be fine for that.Those inexpensive 9mm lenses were certainly tempting, especially when they dropped one even lower during the BF weekend... but I ended up just deciding to wait-and-see some more given my particular circumstance.
As mentioned earlier, hoping for something more like 12-24... probably from Sigma...
I ended up going w/ the K&F Concept lowish-profile 32mm (and also the PD universal adapter) on sale to try on my PD travel tripod. It might not be as good as a more solid one that costs at least $100-200 more, but I'm guessing it'll still be better than the one built into the travel tripod (other than being quite as quick to use and compact-and-light to stowaway-and-lug... though should still likely fit just fine in my PD 30L backpack's side pocket I imagine)...
I figured I won't need a head more solid than that if/when I'm using this travel tripod -- the tripod's max load capacity is only 20lb afterall (and I don't actually feel that comfy sticking my ~4.5lb Tamron 150-600 on it... at least when mostly extended, LOL, though PD seems to show people using it w/ lenses at least that hefty)... and the extra 2-3 inches of the ballhead (plus spirit level) might also be welcomed in actual use.
_Man_
The heaviest load I normally plan on putting on the tripod is a Canon R6mii + RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS, which is about 3 pounds total weight. I may occasionally use it with the Canon R10 + RF 800mm f/11, which would be about 4.25 pounds total, but I don't travel with the 800mm unless we are driving -- and I tend to use a monopod instead of a tripod with the RF 800mm anyway. The RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS is the only telephoto I bring when traveling by plane, as it's a lot smaller and lighter, and I just shoot that handheld. The R10 + RF 100-400 weighs less than 2.4 pounds total.